|
Too often, with the best intentions a method is used to make predictions, but we later find out it is flawed. More research apparently needs to determine if animal tests are really worthwhile.
|
Animal studies valid?
From the December 13, 2006 American Journal ogf Epidemiology Humann healthe risks from low level environmental exposures:No apparent safety thresholds. Wigle and Lamphear
Case studies based on human human epidemiolocal studies for lead and IQ, tobacco smoke and fetal growth, radon and lung cancer, chlorination diinfection by-products in drinking water and bladder concer indicate that there is no apparent safe exposure level, in spite of different results using animal studies other than humans.
|